Sunday, December 27, 2015

2015 Year-End Review

The past year was a whirlwind, but I was fortunate to make exciting strides in my genealogy.

Before I set goals for the year ahead, I'm taking time to pause and reflect on the many accomplishments that broadened and enriched my family history in 2015.

Blogging Family History
I told more stories this year. This is my 40th blog post, which is a 21% increase over the total number of posts I published in 2014.

The increased frequency has been good for readership, too, with nearly 5,500 views for my 2015-published posts. I like to think of growing views as more bait in the cousin pond. The more stories I publish and the more viewers I attract, the increased likelihood I'll connect with a cousin who has a coveted piece of my family history puzzle.

Several posts resonated with readers and quickly became my most highly-read articles for the year.

  • In February, I laid out all of the facts uncovered to-date to determine a time frame in which my 4th great-grandfather Burr Zelah Dornon died (Narrowing Burr's Window of Death). Using a variety of records, including marriage, land, Civil War pension, and a deed of sale, I was able to narrow his death to nine months between 1862 and 1863. 
  • In March, I shared how Facebook connected me with a distant cousin who identified an unknown photo from the 1890s. Facebook Tags Forgotten Ancestor tells the story of laying eyes on my never-before-seen 4th great-grandfather George Chalkley Haworth.
  • My most popular post this year - or any year - was the final episode of a four part series about discovering a non-paternal event and using DNA and genetic genealogy to identify my paternal great-grandfather. Family Mystery Part IV: DNA Doesn't Lie gave me more than conjecture, rumor, and hunches on which to stake my surname.
Photographic Evidence
This was a particularly good year for family history in pictures. I found photographs of seven direct ancestors whom I had never laid eyes on before. It's quite an experience to see - for the first time - seven people who were essential to my existence (ponder that over your morning coffee!).

This includes one newly identified great-grandfather (step aside non-paternal event!), two 2nd great-grandparents, one 3rd great-grandfather, and three 4th great-grandparents.

In addition to the photo of George Chalkley Haworth mentioned above, you can also read about the discovery of the picture of my 3rd great-grandfather Francis Stephen Lamb in Genealogy's Serendipity.

2015 Photo Finds: George Chalkley Haworth (left) + Francis Stephen Lamb (right)

As a cherry on top, I also found a new-to-me photograph of my 2nd great-grandfather John Lumpkins. That makes three known photos of him.

All of these photographs came to me from, or were identified with the help of, distant cousins. It's proof that great rewards await genealogists who research collateral lines and stalk connect with their distant kinfolk.

Visiting the Old Country
Good health is contingent on exercise. You know, getting up from your desk and moving around. Of course, the smart genealogist doesn't leave the research behind. He packs his bags and takes it on the road!

In May, I was in Boston for work. No family historian is going to pass up the opportunity to search out ancestors when traveling. I rented a car and drove a couple hours west for a Massachusetts Family History Trek. The trip culminated in visiting the grave of my 10th great-grandfather John Hawks.


In October, I spent three amazing weeks traveling the length of Italy. My great-grandmother's parents were born in Potenza, a small city nestled atop lush mountainous hills. A highlight of 2015 was the detour I made from my tourist itinerary to visit Where My Ancestors Walked, including the 11th century church where generations of my family were baptized, married, and laid to rest.


Social Media Research Groups
I now manage two Facebook family history groups intended to bring distant cousins together to commemorate, research, and enjoy our shared ancestry.

The groups have empowered my family to slow the loss of our history, which typically disappears within three generations. Both groups have been very active and hugely popular with members. In fact, one of the Facebook groups brought family together for our first organized reunion in several years (Family Reunions in the Digital Age).

RootsTech + FGS Conference Extravaganza
The year got off to an extravagant start with my first visit to Salt Lake City to attend the combined RootsTech and Federation of Genealogical Societies conferences. With over 20,000 attendees, nearly 300 sessions, 140 vendors, and a former First Lady, it was a memorable experience.


The chief highlight was visiting the Family History Research Library. All genealogists must visit at least once in their lifetime. I was able to sneak away from the conference for afternoon research sessions that uncovered tantalizing bits of my Civil War-era ancestry, including my Poor Guilty Creatures.

In an index of Jackson County, Virginia Chancery Court records, I found the name for my 4th great-grandfather Burr Zelah Dornon. My jubilation quickly dissipated when I discovered his record was missing from the microfilm. It took every ounce of maturity I had not to fall to the floor kicking and screaming in a tearful tantrum (please, don't act like genealogists are too mature for that!).

What's In A Name?
For me personally, the greatest accomplishment of 2015 (and to-date in my genealogical endeavors) was busting through a non-paternal event's brick wall and confirming the identity of my paternal great-grandfather (check out the complete series beginning with A Family History Mystery Revealed).

Genealogy is about uncovering truth. Sometimes we encounter family who are reluctant to delve into the past. We even run into family who try to recreate history. The longer a lie is told the more real the fabrication seems. Once family members begin to die, there's no one to question and there's little reason to doubt the stories they told.

Fortunately, the science of DNA works as a truth serum, an elixir that sheds light on the past and casts aside falsehoods concocted to spare shame or pain.

It's this truth that I've valued most in 2015 and it's what I will continue to pursue in 2016. I hope you'll join me for the ride!

Sunday, December 20, 2015

5 Tips to Consider When Digitizing VHS

In 1984, my parents bought their first portable camcorder. It's true, you could hold the camera in your hand, but you also had to lug around the bulky VCR which held the VHS cassette inside. The ensemble would wrap around the shoulder and hang heavily at your side.

When re-watching films that my parents recorded with the machine, I've often wondered if the weight of the contraption was to blame for the short pithy recordings. No one person is ever on screen for too long. Did the videographer need a rest?

Over the past year, my parents have been on a cleaning frenzy. Old treasures from my childhood needed to be picked up immediately or they would be carted off to the local thrift store.

Among the items that surfaced and perplexed my parents were our old VHS tapes. What should be done with these? They no longer owned a functioning VCR, so the tapes sat in a box clinging tightly to their memories like a Rosetta stone waiting to be decoded.

On my most recent trip home, I peaked through the video collection and saw two VHS cassettes with labels that tugged at my genealogist's heartstrings. Both cassettes purportedly contained recordings of our family reunions from 1985 and 1994.


I snagged the films, brought them home with me, and set about the process of converting them to digital. Here are my five tips to consider when digitizing VHS.

1. Don't Delay & Digitize Today 
The first tip may seem obvious, and it is, but how many of us are still sitting on VHS collections that are trapped in their ancient analog confines?

We've all heard that VHS has a limited lifespan. The Digital FAQ, a family-run business that has specialized in media editing and conversion since 1977, estimates that consumer-grade VHS tape begins to degrade within 10-25 years. That means that the time to begin converting tapes recorded in the 1980s and 1990s is now.

In the case of my 1985 family reunion recording, the time to digitize was approximately five years ago (at the latest!).

2. Trust But Verify
VHS tape is fragile, often irreplaceable, and can easily be damaged by malfunctioning VCR equipment. It's important to search out quality professionals you can trust to convert your family treasures.

Don't drop your tapes off with the first vendor you find listed in the phone book. Do your due diligence and find reviews or customer recommendations. Visit websites like Yelp to read consumer feedback.

No reviewed vendors in your area? Don't risk it! Keep looking or locate a vendor elsewhere who will provide a special tracking package to ship your VHS tapes. Otherwise, the cassettes may be safer sitting waiting to be converted by an experienced professional rather than trusted with an untested amateur.

3. Restore & Fix
After converting the 1985 family reunion tape, I was glad to see faces I hadn't seen in decades. Many of them, including my great-grandparents, have long since passed away. But their faces weren't exactly as I remembered them.

Unfortunately, the tape had begun to degrade. The colors had a blue tint. Since my kinfolk aren't Smurfs, I was disappointed to see the degradation on screen.


Discuss the video quality with your hired professional during the conversion process to determine what can (or cannot) be restored or fixed.

4. Share & Identify
Readers of this blog know that I recently created a private Facebook family history group, which includes over a hundred relatives (see Family Reunions in the Digital Age). The group shares old photos, family stories, and commemorates birthday anniversaries for our ancestors. It's been a fantastic way to engage new and old generations in our shared genealogy.

Adding old family recordings to the conversation has been a great source of excitement for the group. It's one thing to see old photos of ancestors who have passed away, but an entirely different experience to see them moving on film and hear their voices.

Consider uploading your digitized films to YouTube (you can do this privately) and share them with your family. In fact, sharing can help you identify those faces you don't recognize.

Another perk to uploading to YouTube is that you now have a copy of the film stored in the cloud for additional safekeeping.

5. Preserve Originals
Lastly, just because you've saved the footage to a digital format doesn't mean you can toss it. As genealogists know all too well, you may again have a need for the original source material.

While the tape quality will continue to degrade, there are important steps you can take to protect and mitigate the VHS's demise. Film School Rejects shares helpful tips, including storing the tapes in a controlled environment away from humidity, extreme temperatures, direct sunlight, and magnets. Also, be kind and rewind (for the tape's sake)!

It's Worth It
Digitizing the two family reunion films and sharing them to my Facebook family history group has won rave reviews.

One cousin called it "A treasure!" and another said, "seeing this glimpse into the past when my parents were alive, and the aunts and uncles is priceless."

What other helpful tips have you learned from your own experiences converting VHS to digital?

Saturday, December 12, 2015

Grandma's Postage Marked World Travels

Bicentennial in Montreal - July 4, 1976
On July 4, 1976 - the peak of America's Bicentennial - my grandmother boarded a private jet and flew with a co-worker from Denver to Montreal.

It was only her second time traveling outside of the United States (following a brief border crossing into Mexico in the 1960s).

From an oral history interview, she recalled that the flight to Canada was bumpy and made her nauseous. Once she landed and was on terra firma she had a spectacular time. She remembered how beautiful the European-esque buildings were, and the green cityscapes provided a refreshing escape from the city's hustle.

My grandmother was a world traveler - both literally and figuratively.

The first postcard was from Hawaii 
I travel a lot for my career and, since my very first flight (a trip to Hawaii for Sea Camp), I always made it a priority to share the adventure with my grandmother. Over the course of 20 years, I mailed her a postcard from each of my destinations.

The memories sent home began short and sweet, but grew more in-depth over the years and illustrated insights about the sites, adventures, and local life.

Beginning with Hawaii to over 40 countries across 5 continents, my grandmother traveled with me. Not literally, but she always shared in the adventures - albeit with a postage mark stamped across them.

Today, on what would have been her 79th birthday, I count myself fortunate that she saved each of these adventures.

Wednesday, December 9, 2015

Family Tree Maker's Curtain Call

Did you hear the rumble in the genealogy community?

It came after Ancestry.com announced that they would stop selling Family Tree Maker at the end of December. T-minus three weeks and counting!
"...we’ve taken a hard look at the declining desktop software market and the impact this has on being able to continue to provide product enhancements and support that our users need. With that, we’ve made the decision to stop selling Family Tree Maker as of December 31, 2015."
The announcement emphasized that tech support would be provided to current software users "at least through January 1, 2017," but that did little to soften the blow.

The reaction from the genealogy community was swift and fierce. Hundreds of angry comments poured in within minutes of the announcement. Folks were overwhelmingly stunned by the sudden decision; caught off guard by the lack of warning.

By the end of the day, nearly 4,000 comments - uniformly negative - expressed dismay and extolled threats to cancel their subscription services with Ancestry. One commenter summed up the angry mob's sentiment:
"Very disappointing and poor decision. It will almost certainly mean ending my Ancestry subscription. I find FTM so superior to working via the ancestry site directly. Whoever made this decision should be out looking for another job!!"
Social media also played host to a slew of shocked and disappointed Tweets and Facebook posts.

Can you blame them for being upset? After all, the product is billed on its site as "the #1-selling family history software." It's not every day that a number one selling product is discontinued with less than a month's notice.

Ancestry says they intend to focus on their website where business continues to grow. Clearly, they believe the future of genealogy and family trees is in the cloud and not stuck on a hard drive. I get that, but change is hard. The software has been around for years (perhaps decades?). Letting go is going to take some time.

There will be those who refuse to let go, and there are other desktop software vendors like RootsMagic already jumping into the fray to capitalize on the wave of displaced customers.

My advice to Ancestry, in the coming year, is to look at the elements of Family Tree Maker that its customers love so much (like the ability to make and print comprehensive, tailored reports) and find ways to integrate them into the website. Frankly, the online site would be better for it and maybe, just maybe, it would quell some of the ire.

What's your take on Ancestry's surprise decision to stop selling Family Tree Maker? Are cloud-based pedigrees the future of genealogy?

Tuesday, December 1, 2015

Family Mystery Part IV: DNA Doesn't Lie

A couple years ago, I stumbled onto a non-paternal event after discovering a birth certificate for my paternal grandfather that listed his father as Jimmy Kirk. Jimmy Kirk was not my great-grandfather's name. At least not the name of the man I believed to be my great-grandfather.

Shortly after this discovery, I heard a family rumor that my great-grandmother had a relationship with a man who worked at the water reservoir beside her home. 

I've blogged my way through this mystery. Catch up on all of the sordid details to-date:
I identified Samuel James Kirk as the likely candidate for my biological paternal great-grandfather, but I still needed something more than conjecture, rumor, and hunches to give me solid answers on which I could stake my surname.

Could there be a role for DNA?

Samuel James Kirk was the son of William Frank Kirk. In total, Samuel had ten siblings (six brothers and four sisters). Unfortunately, they're all deceased. To find answers, I would have to move on to the next generation. One of Samuel's brothers had a daughter who is still alive. 

Autosomal DNA Test
I found an address for her, wrote her a letter, and over the course of several months she shared information on her Kirk family history. In November 2014, she agreed to take an autosomal DNA test with Ancestry.com. 


An email finally arrived with the long-awaited news that her results were in; however, it took a full day for her genetic matches to populate. The wait was torture thrilling! 

Her four closest matches were (drum roll, please...) my father, my aunt, my uncle, and myself.

Bingo! DNA had confirmed a winner.

Ancestry.com estimated her relationship to my dad and his siblings as second cousins. In actual fact, they would be first cousins once removed. This relationship prediction aligned exactly how I would expect it to if Samuel James Kirk was my great-grandfather. 

Based on this genetic evidence, I had finally latched onto the correct Kirk family. Great-grandma did indeed have a very friendly relationship with the reservoir watchman!

Y-DNA Test
After the autosomal DNA test connected me to the correct Kirk family, I began mapping out the family tree. I wanted to locate a direct male Kirk descendant to further confirm the initial DNA results. In preparation, both my father and I took Y-DNA tests with FamilyTreeDNA

My Kirk genealogy determined that William Frank Kirk was the son of James Kirk (1830 - 1917). James and his wife Hester Griffith had eight children, including James Kirk, Jr. 

Following James Jr.'s descendants, I eventually landed on a male Kirk cousin living in the Midwest. Judging by our family tree, he would be my third cousin once removed. But would the DNA confirm the relationship?


I mailed him a letter explaining my interest in researching the Kirk family tree, and then I asked if he would take a DNA test. (It must be so odd to receive a request like that out of the blue!) He wasn't weirded out.

I received a phone call from the cousin. He was on board. I had a Y-DNA test kit shipped to him and after several months (it took him a while to actually take the test) the sample was at the lab for analysis.

In early July 2015, his results came back. He was a very close match with a genetic distance of 1 (on a fast changing marker) for 67 markers. Based on those results, it was safe to say that we did share a common male ancestor - James Kirk - as the paper trail suggested.

Again, DNA had reinforced the case for my link to the Kirk family.

How Far Can I Go?
While I was waiting for the Y-DNA results to arrive, I continued researching the Kirk family tree. I was able to push the paternal line as far back as the paper trail currently supports. 

The furthest my male Kirk line can be traced is to a man named Thomas Kirk (c.1778 - 1846) who was married to Sarah Louise Bonar and lived in Licking County, Ohio. 

After one non-paternal event, you get a bit skittish and begin to only trust the science. The truth DNA brings to genealogy is both refreshing and a confidence builder in the accuracy of your research. Could I genetically confirm Thomas as my 5th great-grandfather?

I would need to find and test another direct male descendant of one of his sons. Fortunately, Thomas had 12 children. Nine of them were boys. There was no shortage of Y-DNA to track down.

I descend from Thomas' eldest child Vachel Kirk. Zeroing in on Thomas' eighth son Greenberry Dorsa Kirk, I eventually found a direct male descendant who was willing to take a 67-marker Y-DNA test.


In late August, his results came back. He was a close match to my father with a genetic distance of two (the same fast changing marker mentioned above and a slow marker).

The test again reinforced the paper trail: I am a descendant of Thomas Kirk. 

Genetic Genealogy Is Here To Stay
The entire mystery of my grandfather's paternity would not have been solved with any level of confidence without the DNA tests.

Genetic genealogy is now a fundamental tool in the genealogist's toolkit. In fact, DNA will likely play a key role in helping to learn the ancestry of Thomas Kirk and his national origins. 

I look forward to the adventure and my newfound role as a citizen scientist. Now where did I put my lab coat?